E-mails et solutions Office - Signification X-VR-SPAMCAUSE
BMPCreated with Sketch.BMPZIPCreated with Sketch.ZIPXLSCreated with Sketch.XLSTXTCreated with Sketch.TXTPPTCreated with Sketch.PPTPNGCreated with Sketch.PNGPDFCreated with Sketch.PDFJPGCreated with Sketch.JPGGIFCreated with Sketch.GIFDOCCreated with Sketch.DOC Error Created with Sketch.
Frage

Signification X-VR-SPAMCAUSE

Von
ClementR5
Erstellungsdatum 2020-05-04 12:33:26 (edited on 2024-09-04 13:14:09) in E-mails et solutions Office

Bonjour,
Nous avons envoyé deux mails à partir du même serveur de mail.
Le mail marqué comme SPAM par OVH a un header "X-VR-SPAMCAUSE" nettement plus long. Pourquoi cet email a été marqué comme spam et pas l'autre ? Les contenus ont l'air similaires, mais l'adresse IP source de l'émission change
Le classement en spam est lié à l'adresse IP, ou à un autre élément ?
Voici les deux headers des messages.
_________________________________________________________
NO SPAM
X-Mailer: MAIL
X-ID: 82609884
X-Ovh-Remote: 185.66.233.10 (opermail-2-10.aquaray.com)
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 1157143632823097143
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: MCE
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 17
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrieehgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucdnofetkffnkffpifculddujedmnecujfgurhepshfkfffuhffvgggtgffosehhqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghirhhivgcuuggvuceuvghsrghnpohonheosggvshgrnhgtohhnsegsvghsrghntghonhdrfhhrqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvedutdefheehtdethfdvjeevueevudfhjedvjeelgfeuvefhffekvdefveelieenucffohhmrghinhepnhhovhgrghhouhhvrdhfrhdpshhohihonhhsqdhsohhlihgurghirhgvshdrfhhrnecukfhppedukeehrdeiiedrvdeffedruddtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepihhnudejrdhmrghilhdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedukeehrdeiiedrvdeffedruddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghouhhntggvsehnohhvrghgohhuvhdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtohepfhgrsghrihgtvgdrughutghhvghsnhgvsehophgvrhgrthhiohhnnhgvlhhlvgdrtghomh
X-Ovh-Spam-Status: OK
X-Ovh-Spam-Reason: vr: OK; dkim: disabled; spf: disabled
X-Ovh-Message-Type: MCE

_________________________________________________________
SPAM
X-Mailer: MAIL
X-ID: 82641690
X-Ovh-Remote: 185.66.233.24 (opermail-2-24.aquaray.com)
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 1835779801892427575
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: SPAM
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 600
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrieehgdduvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucgoufhprghmufhusghjvggtthculdeftddtmdenogfuphgrmhetughnufhusghjvggtthculdeftddtmdenucfjughrpehskfffuffhvfggtgfgofeshhhqredtredtjeenucfhrhhomhepofgrihhrihgvucguvgcuuegvshgrnhopohhnoegsvghsrghntghonhessggvshgrnhgtohhnrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeevuddtfeehhedttefhvdejveeuveduhfejvdejlefgueevhfffkedvfeevleeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehnohhvrghgohhuvhdrfhhrpdhsohihohhnshdqshholhhiuggrihhrvghsrdhfrhenucfkphepudekhedrieeirddvfeefrddvgeenucfuphgrmhfuuhgsjhgvtghtpeeuvghsrghnpohonhcuqdcuvehovhhiugdqudelucfpllcuvdekucemuchrvghnthhrrogvuchstgholhgrihhrvgdpucgurogtohhnfhhinhgvmhgvnhhtucenucfuphgrmhetughnufhusghjvggttheptghllhhllhhllhhlucdqucgtlhhllhhlqdguugcuuhcuugguucemuchllhhllhhllhhluchllhhllhhllhhllhdpuchllhhllhhllhhllhhllhhllhhluchlnecuufhprghmtehlphhhrgfuuhgsjhgvtghtpeijfhhrohhmpghushgvrhiltghovhhiugdgnhdgrhgvnhhtrhgvvghstgholhgrihhrvg
guvggtohhnfhhinhgvmhgvnhhtvghtuhhrghgvnhgtvghsphhougenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehinhefuddrmhgrihhlrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvthepudekhedrieeirddvfeefrddvgedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgesnhhovhgrghhouhhvrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopehfrggsrhhitggvrdguuhgthhgvshhnvgesohhpvghrrghtihhonhhnvghllhgvrdgtohhm
X-Ovh-Spam-Status: SPAM
X-Ovh-Spam-Reason: vr: SPAM; dkim: disabled; spf: disabled
X-Ovh-Message-Type: SPAM
X-Spam-Tag: YES


2 Antworten ( Latest reply on 2024-11-13 20:36:23 Von
fritz2cat officiel (d'avant la migration)
)

ce qui diffère dans le 2e cas: `^SpamSubject (300);^SpamAdnSubject (300);`


SPAMCAUSE


Il y a des données personnelles dans ces trucs encryptés,
j'envoi en intégral en MP après ce post ici en cachant les identités

Vade Retro 01.415.65#116 AS+AV+AP+RT Profile: OVH,CHECKCE; Bailout: 500; *MAILING (17); Hdr=sIDSFTVcEM@hq?0?07; From=Mairie de **<**@**.fr>; VRPattern=7C103550AF27CBC1F7279EBCFD823C96; Domain=nov**.fr,soy**.fr; Ip=185.66.233.10; ClusterSize=0; Param=mode=smtp,helo=in17.mail.ovh.net,inet=185.66.233.10,mailfrom=bounce@nov*.fr,rcptto=fab*@op*.com


Vade Retro 01.415.65#124 AS+AV+AP+RT Profile: OVH,CHECKCE; Bailout: 500; ^SpamSubject (300);^SpamAdnSubject (300); Hdr=sIDSFTVcEM@hq?0?07; From=Mairie de *<*@*.fr>; VRPattern=7C103550AF27CBC1F7279EBCFD823C96; Domain=no*.fr,soy*.fr; Ip=185.66.233.24; SpamSubject=Bes* - Covid-19 N° 28 : rentrée scolaire, déconfinement ; SpamAdnSubject=clllllll - cllll-dd u dd : lllllll llllllll, lllllllllllll l; SpamAlphaSubject={from_user}covid#n#rentreescolairedeconfinementeturgencespod; ClusterSize=1; Param=mode=smtp,helo=in31.mail.ovh.net,inet=185.66.233.24,mailfrom=bounce@no*.fr,rcptto=fab*@op*.com

J'en conclus que c'est le sujet du mail qui a fait tilter l'antispam, par les temps qui courent c'est très mal.

Antworten sind derzeit für diese Frage deaktiviert.