Bare Metal - Thoughts about storage systems with regard to functions
Answers to your questions / Bare Metal / Thoughts about storage sy...
BMPCreated with Sketch.BMPZIPCreated with Sketch.ZIPXLSCreated with Sketch.XLSTXTCreated with Sketch.TXTPPTCreated with Sketch.PPTPNGCreated with Sketch.PNGPDFCreated with Sketch.PDFJPGCreated with Sketch.JPGGIFCreated with Sketch.GIFDOCCreated with Sketch.DOC Error Created with Sketch.
Frage

Thoughts about storage systems with regard to functions

Von
Community Deleted user
Erstellungsdatum 2018-01-16 15:29:01 (edited on 2024-09-04 14:25:01) in Bare Metal

I'm really looking forward to have FaaS on the OVH cloud and even proposed it last year but I have one concern.
Since those functions are stateless, it's required in most cases to interact with a database or, much more scalable, an object storage.
OVH already offers one but the latency is horrible (~200ms vs 30ms on Azure/AWS) and therefore a huge disadvantage. On the other hand, no competitor currently provides an object storage built on NVMe SSDs. So if OpenStack isn't the problem I highly suggest to launch a low-latency option together with OVH Functions. It would still be attractive at multiple times of the current price.


Antworten sind derzeit für diese Frage deaktiviert.